AOPA Disputes Brookings Institution Report on Aviation

The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) believes that federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants for general aviation (GA) airports should be preserved because of the important role these airports play within the national air transportation system. This is in stark contrast with a new report from the Washington, D.C.-based Brookings Institution that recommends cutting the AIP mandatory spending floor for general aviation airports.

The report, which was released this morning, focuses on international commercial air travel, noting that growth in international passengers during a 21-year period more than doubled the increase in domestic passengers. The report recommends that airports serving these flights should receive a greater share of government aid at a cost to GA airports nationwide.  These redirected AIP funds would be above and beyond what large airports are already collecting through passenger facility charges.

 
AOPA CEO Craig Fuller said general aviation airports are used by businesses of all sizes to generate opportunities and create growth in communities that aren’t easily accessible by commercial aviation. “It is vital that AIP funding for small and non-hub airports remain in place to help pay for critical infrastructure projects. These airports are a lifeline to communities across the United States that rely on general aviation for disaster relief, emergency medical transportation, and basic services like law enforcement and fire-fighting.”
 
The network of general aviation airports across the country also infuses both urban and rural areas with much-needed tax revenue and jobs. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in 2009 (the last year for which figures are available) non-airline operators at general aviation airports spent more than $12 billion, making an estimated 27 million flights for emergency medical services, agricultural functions, time-sensitive air cargo services, fire-fighting, law enforcement and border control, flight training, business travel, and some scheduled services.
 
In the same study, the FAA also noted that “having a well-developed system of GA airports throughout the country supports commerce while also providing a safety net of airports to support emergency aircraft diversions when necessary due to mechanical problems, medical emergencies, deteriorating weather conditions or other unforeseen circumstances.”
 
View the FAA study: http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/ga_study/
 
Attachment:

Kim Stevens

Kim Stevens is the publisher of State Aviation Journal, which he founded in 2009. A longtime commercial-rated pilot, he was introduced to state aviation in 1992 as Director of the Nebraska Department of Aeronautics, later serving as Deputy Division Director for the Arizona Department of Transportation's Aeronautics Division. From 2013 to 2018, he was Director of Communications and Operations for the National Association of State Aviation Officials (NASAO) in Washington, D.C. Relocating to North Carolina, Kim worked for the Raleigh-Durham International Airport for two years and now concentrates solely on the Journal. Prior to his aviation career, Kim spent a decade in the newspaper and magazine business.