As support for the Pilots Bill of Rights 2 (PBR2) continues to grow, Sen. James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) has taken to the Senate floor to explain key provisions of the measure.<\/p>\n
As of Sept. 25, 67 senators and 140 members of the House from both parties had signed on to cosponsor PBR2. Since July, when the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) sent a call to action asking members to contact their elected officials, the number of PBR2 cosponsors has grown by some 60 names. <\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re pleased to see the number of cosponsors continue to rise,\u201d said Jim Coon, AOPA senior vice president of government affairs. \u201cTens of thousands of AOPA members have contacted their elected officials and asked them to cosponsor PBR2, and our staff has left no stone unturned when it comes to building support for this legislation. There\u2019s still a lot of work left to do before third-class medical reform becomes a reality, either as part of PBR2 or as an amendment to other legislation, but we are closer than we\u2019ve ever been before to getting this done.\u201d
\n
\nIn his remarks on the Senate floor, Inhofe noted that a decade of experience with the Sport Pilot rule has proven that pilots can fly safely without going through the third-class medical process.<\/p>\n
PBR2 was first introduced in the House and Senate in February and has since undergone some revisions to address concerns raised by members of Congress and others. Inhofe addressed those changes in his floor speech, emphasizing that under PBR2 pilots would be spared the hassle of repeatedly going through the third-class medical process.<\/p>\n
Under the legislation, thousands of pilots flying a wide range of aircraft would not be required to obtain a third-class medical certificate.<\/p>\n
While new pilots would need to obtain FAA medical certification one time in order to establish a benchmark for their health, they would not need to make repeat visits to an FAA aviation medical examiner (AME). Any pilot who has held a valid third-class medical, either regular or special issuance, within the past 10 years, would be considered as having met the initial certification requirement. Private pilots who have had a heart condition involving surgery, mental, or neurological issues would be required to go through the special issuance process one time only.<\/p>\n
In addition, pilots would be required to take an online medical education course every two years. The course would cover a range of aviation medical issues, including the effects of over the counter medications on pilots.<\/p>\n
\u201cRequiring pilots to take this course boosts aviation safety for the general aviation community,\u201d Inhofe said.<\/p>\n
Pilots also would be required to see their personal physician at least once every four years, make a note of the visit in their logbooks, and certify that they are receiving proper care for any condition requiring medical treatment. As proof that they\u2019ve met the requirement, pilots would need to provide the doctor\u2019s name and address and the date of the exam when they take the online medical course. They would also have to note the information in their logbooks, but would not have to file any paperwork with the FAA. This approach would help foster honest dialogues between pilots and their doctors and ensure that pilots receive the medical care they need, Inhofe said.<\/p>\n
The medical exemption created by PBR2 would not change the requirement that pilots self-certify their fitness before every flight. But it would give pilots relief from what Inhofe described as the \u201cconstant churn of submitting paperwork over and over,\u201d even when the pilot\u2019s medical status is unchanged.<\/p>\n
The modifications to PBR2 outlined by Inhofe in his floor speech closely match the terms of the so-called Manchin Amendment, which was submitted, but did not become part of, the Senate highway bill passed in July. That amendment came under fire from the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), which said it would not support the measure, although numerous other pilot groups and unions have endorsed it. Since that time AOPA has met with ALPA to seek common ground.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019ve worked with the leaders of ALPA and addressed their safety concerns,\u201d said Coon. “We’ve been told they now believe that third class medical reform does not pose a safety risk.”<\/p>\n
AOPA has been mobilizing members, working with senators and members of the House, and exploring every possible option for obtaining third-class medical reform.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re 100 percent committed to getting the very best possible deal for our members, and getting it done as fast as possible,\u201d said Coon. \u201cThere are many factors beyond our control, including a limited number of legislative days before the end of the year and major political issues like funding for Planned Parenthood, but we are 100 percent committed to getting third-class medical reform. We\u2019ll keep working to build momentum for PBR2 and we\u2019ll continue to look for opportunities to have medical reform language included in other types of legislation that are moving through Congress.\u201d<\/p>\n